To describe a BuildConfig named "name" in OpenShift, which command is correct?

To describe a BuildConfig named "name" in OpenShift, which command is correct?

• A. oc describe build name
• B. oc describe bc name
• C. oc describe pod name
• D. oc describe dc name

Answer: (B)

In OpenShift, you inspect a specific resource by using oc describe followed by the resource type and its name. For a BuildConfig, the resource type is abbreviated as bc. So describing a BuildConfig named "name" is done with oc describe bc name. This shows the BuildConfig’s details—its build strategy, source, output, triggers, and current status—along with any recent events. Describing a Build (oc describe build name) would target a Build object, not the BuildConfig. Describing a Pod (oc describe pod name) or a DeploymentConfig (oc describe dc name) would target different resources entirely.

In OpenShift, you inspect a specific resource by using oc describe followed by the resource type and its name. For a BuildConfig, the resource type is abbreviated as bc. So describing a BuildConfig named "name" is done with oc describe bc name. This shows the BuildConfig’s details—its build strategy, source, output, triggers, and current status—along with any recent events.

Describing a Build (oc describe build name) would target a Build object, not the BuildConfig. Describing a Pod (oc describe pod name) or a DeploymentConfig (oc describe dc name) would target different resources entirely.